[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220120140340.GC11223@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:03:40 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Phyr Starter
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 06:37:03PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> But let's go further than that (which only brings us to 32 bytes per
> range). For the systems you care about which use an identity mapping,
> and have sizeof(dma_addr_t) == sizeof(phys_addr_t), we can simply
> point the dma_range pointer to the same memory as the phyr. We just
> have to not free it too early. That gets us down to 16 bytes per range,
> a saving of 33%.
Even without an IOMMU the dma_addr_t can have offsets vs the actual
physical address. Not on x86 except for a weirdo SOC, but just about
everywhere else.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists