[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220120165522.v2xitzokcom4phmw@pali>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:55:22 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] PCI: mvebu: Use child_ops API
On Thursday 20 January 2022 10:49:05 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:18:11PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Split struct pci_ops between ops and child_ops. Member ops is used for
> > accessing PCIe Root Ports via pci-bridge-emul.c driver and child_ops for
> > accessing real PCIe cards.
> >
> > There is no need to mix these two struct pci_ops into one as PCI core code
> > already provides separate callbacks via bridge->ops and bridge->child_ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> > index 9ea2f6a7c2b0..1e90ab888075 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> > @@ -294,11 +294,29 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
> > mvebu_writel(port, mask, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
> > }
> >
> > -static int mvebu_pcie_hw_rd_conf(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port,
> > - struct pci_bus *bus,
> > - u32 devfn, int where, int size, u32 *val)
> > +static struct mvebu_pcie_port *mvebu_pcie_find_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
> > + struct pci_bus *bus,
> > + int devfn);
> > +
> > +static int mvebu_pcie_child_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
> > + int size, u32 *val)
> > {
> > - void __iomem *conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
> > + struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
> > + struct mvebu_pcie_port *port;
> > + void __iomem *conf_data;
> > +
> > + port = mvebu_pcie_find_port(pcie, bus, devfn);
> > + if (!port) {
> > + *val = 0xffffffff;
> > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!mvebu_pcie_link_up(port)) {
> > + *val = 0xffffffff;
> > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > + }
> > +
> > + conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
> >
> > mvebu_writel(port, PCIE_CONF_ADDR(bus->number, devfn, where),
> > PCIE_CONF_ADDR_OFF);
> > @@ -321,11 +339,21 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_hw_rd_conf(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port,
> > return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> > }
> >
> > -static int mvebu_pcie_hw_wr_conf(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port,
> > - struct pci_bus *bus,
> > - u32 devfn, int where, int size, u32 val)
> > +static int mvebu_pcie_child_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
> > + int where, int size, u32 val)
> > {
> > - void __iomem *conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
> > + struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
> > + struct mvebu_pcie_port *port;
> > + void __iomem *conf_data;
> > +
>
> > + port = mvebu_pcie_find_port(pcie, bus, devfn);
> > + if (!port)
> > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > +
> > + if (!mvebu_pcie_link_up(port))
> > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> > +
> > + conf_data = port->base + PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF;
>
> Again, the same setup code in read and write is a sign to use
> .map_bus(). You can copy it from my version I pointed you to.
>
> Rob
I'm planning to do other cleanup in followup patches. But there are too
many mvebu and aardvark patches on the list waiting, and I do not want
to send another batch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists