[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-ca6db968-3278-4108-b8f5-4435eb40def5@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:58:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] riscv: default to CONFIG_RISCV_SBI_V01=n
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 04:35:38 PST (-0800), heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com wrote:
> The SBI 0.1 specification is obsolete. The current version is 0.3.
> Hence we should not rely by default on SBI 0.1 being implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 09abf62ae0ad..f177ad3bee0f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ source "kernel/Kconfig.hz"
>
> config RISCV_SBI_V01
> bool "SBI v0.1 support"
> - default y
> depends on RISCV_SBI
> help
> This config allows kernel to use SBI v0.1 APIs. This will be
Thanks, this is on for-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists