[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YemWCwhQ8aYcqUw9@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:04:11 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] KVM: SVM: WARN if KVM attempts emulation on #UD or
#GP for SEV guests
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022, Liam Merwick wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 01:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > WARN if KVM attempts to emulate in response to #UD or #GP for SEV guests,
> > i.e. if KVM intercepts #UD or #GP, as emulation on any fault except #NPF
> > is impossible since KVM cannot read guest private memory to get the code
> > stream, and the CPU's DecodeAssists feature only provides the instruction
> > bytes on #NPF.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > index 994224ae2731..ed2ca875b84b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > @@ -4267,6 +4267,9 @@ static bool svm_can_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emul_type,
> > if (!sev_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> > return true;
> > + /* #UD and #GP should never be intercepted for SEV guests. */
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(emul_type & (EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD | EMULTYPE_VMWARE_GP));
>
> What about EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD_FORCED?
Hmm, yeah, it's worth adding, there's no additional cost. I was thinking it was
a modifier to EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD, but it's a replacement specifically to bypass
the EmulateOnUD check (which I should have remembered since I added the type...).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists