linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: reuse the unshared swapcache page in do_wp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wirJT_K381J+8AAnOeyEtUuQ=eAwg=EzBJPcN7TyygNbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jan 2022 19:22:03 +0200
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "zhangliang (AG)" <zhangliang5@...wei.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        wangzhigang17@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: reuse the unshared swapcache page in do_wp_page

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 5:46 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> I'm, not concerned about fork(), I'm concerned about other false positives.

Without a fork(), you won't have the THP marked for COW, so is it
really an issue?

> Here is what I currently have, I hope that makes sense:

>From a quick look, that patch looks fine to me, but there might be
something I'm missing... And who knows what odd usage patterns there
might be in this area. The whole odd Android thing with forking that
zygote process.

Because that zygote thing _does_ use THP, I think, and it's where the
wrong-way COW thing mattered. Obviously doing COW is the right thing
to do, and that case doesn't want any sharing of pages (all copies),
but it might be worth at least checking that it works and there isn't
some odd performance gotcha.

               Linus