[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220120041421.ngrxukhb4t6b7tlq@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 20:14:21 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, peterz@...radead.org,
x86@...nel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: introduce bpf_prog_pack allocator
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 03:06:19PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
>
> +/*
> + * BPF program pack allocator.
> + *
> + * Most BPF programs are pretty small. Allocating a hole page for each
> + * program is sometime a waste. Many small bpf program also adds pressure
> + * to instruction TLB. To solve this issue, we introduce a BPF program pack
> + * allocator. The prog_pack allocator uses HPAGE_PMD_SIZE page (2MB on x86)
> + * to host BPF programs.
> + */
> +#define BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE HPAGE_PMD_SIZE
> +#define BPF_PROG_MAX_PACK_PROG_SIZE HPAGE_PMD_SIZE
We have a synthetic test with 1M bpf instructions. How did it JIT?
Are you saying we were lucky that every BPF insn was JITed to <2 bytes x86?
Did I misread the 2MB limit?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists