[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220121082951.GA46247@b53fa9759326>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:29:52 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@...edance.com>, mst@...hat.com,
arei.gonglei@...wei.com
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
helei.sig11@...edance.com, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@...edance.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] virtio-crypto: virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req() can be static
drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c:276:5: warning: symbol 'virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c
index eebccf71b2fab..2b3f8780b7551 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algo.c
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int __virtio_crypto_akcipher_do_req(struct virtio_crypto_akcipher_request
return -ENOMEM;
}
-int virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *vreq)
+static int virtio_crypto_rsa_do_req(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *vreq)
{
struct akcipher_request *req = container_of(vreq, struct akcipher_request, base);
struct virtio_crypto_akcipher_request *vc_akcipher_req = akcipher_request_ctx(req);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists