linux-kernel - Re: [Question] set_cpus_allowed_ptr() call failed at cpuset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:33:00 +0800
From:   Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
To:     Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
CC:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        <hannes@...xchg.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Question] set_cpus_allowed_ptr() call failed at cpuset_attach()



在 2022/1/20 22:02, Michal Koutný 写道:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 03:14:22PM +0800, Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com> wrote:
>> i think the troublesome scenario as follows:
>>      cpuset_can_attach
>>        down_read(cpuset_rwsem)
>>          // check all migratees
>>        up_read(cpuset_rwsem)
>>                                        			[ _cpu_down / cpuhp_setup_state ]
>>      cpuset_attach
>>       	down_write(cpuset_rwsem)
>> 	guarantee_online_cpus() // (load cpus_attach)
>> 	     						sched_cpu_deactivate
>> 							  set_cpu_active(cpu, false)  // will change cpu_active_mask
>>         set_cpus_allowed_ptr(cpus_attach)
>> 	   __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked()
>> 	     // (if the intersection of cpus_attach and
>> 	      cpu_active_mask is empty, will return -EINVAL)
>>        up_write(cpuset_rwsem)
>> 	                                     		schedule_work
>>         	                               		...
>>                 	                       		cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks
>>                         	                	 down_write(cpuset_rwsem)
>> 	                                	         up_write(cpuset_rwsem)
>> 		                                       ... flush_work
>>         		                               [ _cpu_down / cpu_up_down_serialize_trainwrecks ]
> 
> Thanks, a locking loophole indeed.
> 
> FTR, meanwhile I noticed: a) cpuset_fork() looks buggy when
> CLONE_INTO_CGROUP (and dst.cpus != src.cpus), b) it'd be affected with
> similar hotplug race.

Yes, it shouldn't set the current task's cpumak to the child process at cpuset_fork().

Regards,
Qiao
.
> 
> Michal
> .
>