[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25e7d6db-1cff-6fd5-1071-1f21c5ff7a8a@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:22:52 +0200
From: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
To: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Cc: "open list:MEDIA INPUT INFRASTRUCTURE (V4L/DVB)"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
hverkuil@...all.nl, kernel@...labora.com, dafna3@...il.com,
kiril.bicevski@...labora.com,
Nas Chung <nas.chung@...psnmedia.com>,
lafley.kim@...psnmedia.com, scott.woo@...psnmedia.com,
olivier.crete@...labora.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] staging: media: wave5: Add vpuapi layer
On 14.12.21 12:20, Daniel Palmer wrote:
> Hi Dafna,
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 16:48, Dafna Hirschfeld
> <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com> wrote:
>>>>> +static int wave5_wait_bus_busy(struct vpu_device *vpu_dev, int timeout, unsigned int addr)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + u32 gdi_status_check_value = 0x3f;
>>>>> + u32 data;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (vpu_dev->product_code == WAVE521C_CODE ||
>>>>> + vpu_dev->product_code == WAVE521_CODE ||
>>>>> + vpu_dev->product_code == WAVE521E1_CODE)
>>>>> + gdi_status_check_value = 0x00ff1f3f;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return read_poll_timeout(wave5_vdi_read_register, data, data == gdi_status_check_value,
>>>>> + 0, timeout * 1000, false, vpu_dev, addr);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> This looks like it should be s/wave5_vdi_read_register/wave5_read_register/.
>>>> For wave511 addr passed in here is 0x8e14 so well outside of what is
>>>> directly accessible.
>>>
>>> Hi, I didn't understand this explanation. I see that
>>> wave5_read_register eventually calls 'wave5_vdi_read_register'.
>>> Could you please explain in more detail why you think
>>> calling wave5_vdi_read_register is wrong?
>
> Mainly because the address accessed 0x8e14 but on my machine the
> directly accessible registers end at 0x800.
>
>> hi, I see know that those backbone address are indeed not read and written directly but
>> the address should be first written to a regsiter W5_VPU_FIO_CTRL_ADDR,
>> and then the content is returned from W5_VPU_FIO_DATA.
>
> I think so. But as I can't get this driver to fully work yet I can
> only say I think so.
Hi,
Thanks a lot for helping me with compiling the kernel and booting the smart display 'ido-sbc2d70-v1b'.
I am now at a point where the probe of the driver on that board fails with:
[ 30.710385] write --> 0x000000f0:0x00000001
[ 30.727445] wave5_vpu_reset:1594
[ 30.730712] write --> 0x00000070:0x00000000
[ 30.734944] wave5_vpu_reset:1652
[ 30.738186] write --> 0x00000024:0x00000007
[ 30.742382] write --> 0x00000020:0x00018e10
[ 40.746598] wave5_vpu_reset:1656
[ 40.749849] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.16.0-11196-gd076cd89f795-dirty #14
[ 40.757531] Hardware name: MStar/Sigmastar Armv7 (Device Tree)
[ 40.763389] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
[ 40.768647] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c
[ 40.773720] dump_stack_lvl from wave5_wait_bus_busy+0x10/0x44
[ 40.779579] wave5_wait_bus_busy from wave5_vpu_reset+0x28c/0x584
[ 40.785696] wave5_vpu_reset from wave5_vpu_init_with_bitcode+0x58/0xe8
[ 40.792337] wave5_vpu_init_with_bitcode from wave5_vpu_probe+0x2b0/0x560
[ 40.799153] wave5_vpu_probe from platform_probe+0x5c/0xb8
[ 40.804663] platform_probe from really_probe+0xc0/0x2fc
[ 40.809998] really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0x84/0xe4
[ 40.815854] __driver_probe_device from device_driver_attach+0x24/0x50
[ 40.822407] device_driver_attach from bind_store+0x80/0xec
[ 40.828002] bind_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1b4
[ 40.833860] kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x308/0x3fc
[ 40.839631] vfs_write from ksys_write+0xa4/0xd4
[ 40.844268] ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54
[ 40.849427] Exception stack(0xc189dfa8 to 0xc189dff0)
[ 40.854497] dfa0: 004751a8 00000015 00000001 004751a8 00000015 00000001
[ 40.862700] dfc0: 004751a8 00000015 00000001 00000004 00000015 bea7eb50 00460a6d 004745e4
[ 40.870900] dfe0: 00000000 bea7e924 0045d43f b6f71cf6
[ 40.875987] write --> 0x00000020:0x00008e14
[ 50.880186] write --> 0x00000024:0x00000000
[ 50.884397] write --> 0x00000020:0x00018e10
[ 60.888598] vdec 1f344800.video-codec: wave5_vpu_reset failed -16
[ 60.894726] vdec 1f344800.video-codec: vpu_init_with_bitcode fail
[ 60.900889] vcc_5v: disabling
[ 60.903890] vcc_sd: disabling
[ 60.904026] vdec 1f344800.video-codec: failed to wave5_vpu_load_firmware: -16
[ 60.906869] vcc_4g: disabling
[ 60.914729] vdec: probe of 1f344800.video-codec failed with error -16
Were you able to reach a point where the probe succeed ?
Could you write in more detail to which point were you able to make the driver work?
Does the driver code in https://github.com/linux-chenxing/linux/tree/mstar_v5_17_rebase includes a fix to the bug you mentioned above?
Thanks,
Dafna
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists