linux-kernel - [PATCH -v2] powerpc/process, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in __get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220121014418.155675-1-heying24@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jan 2022 20:44:18 -0500
From:   He Ying <heying24@...wei.com>
To:     <catalin.marinas@....com>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
        <npiggin@...il.com>, <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        <sxwjean@...il.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:     <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <heying24@...wei.com>, <huwanming@...weil.com>,
        <chenjingwen6@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -v2] powerpc/process, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in __get_wchan()

The following KASAN warning was reported in our kernel.

  BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in get_wchan+0x188/0x250
  Read of size 4 at addr d216f958 by task ps/14437

  CPU: 3 PID: 14437 Comm: ps Tainted: G           O      5.10.0 #1
  Call Trace:
  [daa63858] [c0654348] dump_stack+0x9c/0xe4 (unreliable)
  [daa63888] [c035cf0c] print_address_description.constprop.3+0x8c/0x570
  [daa63908] [c035d6bc] kasan_report+0x1ac/0x218
  [daa63948] [c00496e8] get_wchan+0x188/0x250
  [daa63978] [c0461ec8] do_task_stat+0xce8/0xe60
  [daa63b98] [c0455ac8] proc_single_show+0x98/0x170
  [daa63bc8] [c03cab8c] seq_read_iter+0x1ec/0x900
  [daa63c38] [c03cb47c] seq_read+0x1dc/0x290
  [daa63d68] [c037fc94] vfs_read+0x164/0x510
  [daa63ea8] [c03808e4] ksys_read+0x144/0x1d0
  [daa63f38] [c005b1dc] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
  --- interrupt: c00 at 0x8fa8f4
      LR = 0x8fa8cc

  The buggy address belongs to the page:
  page:98ebcdd2 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x2 pfn:0x1216f
  flags: 0x0()
  raw: 00000000 00000000 01010122 00000000 00000002 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
  raw: 00000000
  page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

  Memory state around the buggy address:
   d216f800: 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
   d216f880: f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  >d216f900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00
                                            ^
   d216f980: f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
   d216fa00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

After looking into this issue, I find the buggy address belongs
to the task stack region. It seems KASAN has something wrong.
I look into the code of __get_wchan in x86 architecture and
find the same issue has been resolved by the commit
f7d27c35ddff ("x86/mm, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()").
The solution could be applied to powerpc architecture too.

As Andrey Ryabinin said, get_wchan() is racy by design, it may
access volatile stack of running task, thus it may access
redzone in a stack frame and cause KASAN to warn about this.

Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() to silence these warnings.

Reported-by: Wanming Hu <huwanming@...weil.com>
Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jingwen <chenjingwen6@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
Changelog:

v2:
* Add missing Reported-by and SoB tags
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 984813a4d5dc..a75d20f23dac 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2160,12 +2160,12 @@ static unsigned long ___get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
 		return 0;
 
 	do {
-		sp = *(unsigned long *)sp;
+		sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)sp);
 		if (!validate_sp(sp, p, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD) ||
 		    task_is_running(p))
 			return 0;
 		if (count > 0) {
-			ip = ((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+			ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)sp)[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE]);
 			if (!in_sched_functions(ip))
 				return ip;
 		}
-- 
2.17.1