[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8v1to4w0yw17DgbQic2nkX4s+W3ZxPEdp89=9SLxwvBMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:52:14 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] media: dt-bindings: media: Document RZ/G2L
CSI-2 block
Hi Geert,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:26 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:06 AM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > Document the CSI-2 block which is part of CRU found in Renesas
> > RZ/G2L SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > ---
> > Hi Geert/All,
> >
> > vclk and pclk clocks are shared with CRU both CSI and CRU driver are using
> > pm_runtime. pclk clock is necessary for register access where as vclk clock
> > is only used for calculations. So would you suggest passing vclk as part of
>
> What do you mean by "calculations"?
To set the CSI2nMCT2 register bits (FRRSKW/FRRCLK), vclk clock rate is used.
> The bindings say this is the main clock?
>
That is because the RZG2L_clock_list_r02_02.xlsx mentions it as the main clock.
> > clocks (as currently implemented) or pass the vclk clock rate as a dt property.
>
> Please do not specify clock rates in DT, but always pass clock
> specifiers instead.
> The clock subsystem handles sharing of clocks just fine.
>
Agreed.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists