| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 18:24:52 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Devaraj Rangasamy <Devaraj.Rangasamy@....com>,
Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Jerome Forissier <jerome@...issier.org>,
Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] optee: use driver internal tee_contex for some rpc
+ Jerome, Etienne
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 20:38, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Uses the new driver internal tee_context when allocating driver private
> shared memory. This decouples the shared memory object from its original
> tee_context. This is needed when the life time of such a memory
> allocation outlives the client tee_context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 7 ++++---
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
I guess with this patch we should no longer see issues [1] reported earlier.
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
[1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/1918
-Sumit
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> index 88a028d4fb7b..5ec484b42432 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static struct tee_shm_pool *optee_ffa_shm_pool_alloc_pages(void)
> */
>
> static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> + struct optee *optee,
> struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> {
> struct tee_shm *shm;
> @@ -439,7 +440,7 @@ static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> shm = optee_rpc_cmd_alloc_suppl(ctx, arg->params[0].u.value.b);
> break;
> case OPTEE_RPC_SHM_TYPE_KERNEL:
> - shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(ctx,
> + shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(optee->ctx,
> arg->params[0].u.value.b);
> break;
> default:
> @@ -493,14 +494,13 @@ static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(struct tee_context *ctx,
> }
>
> static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx,
> + struct optee *optee,
> struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> {
> - struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev);
> -
> arg->ret_origin = TEEC_ORIGIN_COMMS;
> switch (arg->cmd) {
> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC:
> - handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, arg);
> + handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, optee, arg);
> break;
> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE:
> handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(ctx, optee, arg);
> @@ -510,12 +510,12 @@ static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx,
> }
> }
>
> -static void optee_handle_ffa_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 cmd,
> - struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> +static void optee_handle_ffa_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee *optee,
> + u32 cmd, struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> {
> switch (cmd) {
> case OPTEE_FFA_YIELDING_CALL_RETURN_RPC_CMD:
> - handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(ctx, arg);
> + handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(ctx, optee, arg);
> break;
> case OPTEE_FFA_YIELDING_CALL_RETURN_INTERRUPT:
> /* Interrupt delivered by now */
> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static int optee_ffa_yielding_call(struct tee_context *ctx,
> * above.
> */
> cond_resched();
> - optee_handle_ffa_rpc(ctx, data->data1, rpc_arg);
> + optee_handle_ffa_rpc(ctx, optee, data->data1, rpc_arg);
> cmd = OPTEE_FFA_YIELDING_CALL_RESUME;
> data->data0 = cmd;
> data->data1 = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> index 1dbb13b08381..f2ef76451443 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(struct tee_context *ctx,
> }
>
> static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> + struct optee *optee,
> struct optee_msg_arg *arg,
> struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx)
> {
> @@ -650,7 +651,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> shm = optee_rpc_cmd_alloc_suppl(ctx, sz);
> break;
> case OPTEE_RPC_SHM_TYPE_KERNEL:
> - shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(ctx, sz);
> + shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(optee->ctx, sz);
> break;
> default:
> arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> @@ -746,7 +747,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee *optee,
> switch (arg->cmd) {
> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC:
> free_pages_list(call_ctx);
> - handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, arg, call_ctx);
> + handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, optee, arg, call_ctx);
> break;
> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE:
> handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(ctx, arg);
> @@ -775,7 +776,7 @@ static void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx,
>
> switch (OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_GET_RPC_FUNC(param->a0)) {
> case OPTEE_SMC_RPC_FUNC_ALLOC:
> - shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(ctx, param->a1);
> + shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(optee->ctx, param->a1);
> if (!IS_ERR(shm) && !tee_shm_get_pa(shm, 0, &pa)) {
> reg_pair_from_64(¶m->a1, ¶m->a2, pa);
> reg_pair_from_64(¶m->a4, ¶m->a5,
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists