| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHUa44H-t2fVFWHQDU6ZjY7qyk53rbOi_h7=V_pYXTN+TtbMjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:02:06 +0100
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: Jerome Forissier <jerome@...issier.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Devaraj Rangasamy <Devaraj.Rangasamy@....com>,
Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] optee: use driver internal tee_contex for some rpc
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:37 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 18:58, Jerome Forissier <jerome@...issier.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/21/22 13:54, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > + Jerome, Etienne
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 20:38, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Uses the new driver internal tee_context when allocating driver private
> > >> shared memory. This decouples the shared memory object from its original
> > >> tee_context. This is needed when the life time of such a memory
> > >> allocation outlives the client tee_context.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
> > >> ---
> > >> drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > >> drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 7 ++++---
> > >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >
> > > I guess with this patch we should no longer see issues [1] reported earlier.
> >
> > Correct. I have tested [1] again in QEMU with this whole series applied
> > and the issue is gone.
> >
>
> Thanks for the confirmation.
>
> Jens,
>
> Can we have a Fixes tag for this and CC stable? I know it won't be
> directly applicable to stable kernels but we can help with a backport.
>
OK, I'll add that.
Thanks,
Jens
> -Sumit
>
> > --
> > Jerome
> >
> > >
> > > FWIW,
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/1918
> > >
> > > -Sumit
> > >
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > >> index 88a028d4fb7b..5ec484b42432 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > >> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static struct tee_shm_pool *optee_ffa_shm_pool_alloc_pages(void)
> > >> */
> > >>
> > >> static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> + struct optee *optee,
> > >> struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> > >> {
> > >> struct tee_shm *shm;
> > >> @@ -439,7 +440,7 @@ static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> shm = optee_rpc_cmd_alloc_suppl(ctx, arg->params[0].u.value.b);
> > >> break;
> > >> case OPTEE_RPC_SHM_TYPE_KERNEL:
> > >> - shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(ctx,
> > >> + shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(optee->ctx,
> > >> arg->params[0].u.value.b);
> > >> break;
> > >> default:
> > >> @@ -493,14 +494,13 @@ static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> + struct optee *optee,
> > >> struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> > >> {
> > >> - struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev);
> > >> -
> > >> arg->ret_origin = TEEC_ORIGIN_COMMS;
> > >> switch (arg->cmd) {
> > >> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC:
> > >> - handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, arg);
> > >> + handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, optee, arg);
> > >> break;
> > >> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE:
> > >> handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(ctx, optee, arg);
> > >> @@ -510,12 +510,12 @@ static void handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> }
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> -static void optee_handle_ffa_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 cmd,
> > >> - struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> > >> +static void optee_handle_ffa_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee *optee,
> > >> + u32 cmd, struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> > >> {
> > >> switch (cmd) {
> > >> case OPTEE_FFA_YIELDING_CALL_RETURN_RPC_CMD:
> > >> - handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(ctx, arg);
> > >> + handle_ffa_rpc_func_cmd(ctx, optee, arg);
> > >> break;
> > >> case OPTEE_FFA_YIELDING_CALL_RETURN_INTERRUPT:
> > >> /* Interrupt delivered by now */
> > >> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static int optee_ffa_yielding_call(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> * above.
> > >> */
> > >> cond_resched();
> > >> - optee_handle_ffa_rpc(ctx, data->data1, rpc_arg);
> > >> + optee_handle_ffa_rpc(ctx, optee, data->data1, rpc_arg);
> > >> cmd = OPTEE_FFA_YIELDING_CALL_RESUME;
> > >> data->data0 = cmd;
> > >> data->data1 = 0;
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > >> index 1dbb13b08381..f2ef76451443 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > >> @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> + struct optee *optee,
> > >> struct optee_msg_arg *arg,
> > >> struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx)
> > >> {
> > >> @@ -650,7 +651,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >> shm = optee_rpc_cmd_alloc_suppl(ctx, sz);
> > >> break;
> > >> case OPTEE_RPC_SHM_TYPE_KERNEL:
> > >> - shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(ctx, sz);
> > >> + shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(optee->ctx, sz);
> > >> break;
> > >> default:
> > >> arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> > >> @@ -746,7 +747,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee *optee,
> > >> switch (arg->cmd) {
> > >> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC:
> > >> free_pages_list(call_ctx);
> > >> - handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, arg, call_ctx);
> > >> + handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_alloc(ctx, optee, arg, call_ctx);
> > >> break;
> > >> case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE:
> > >> handle_rpc_func_cmd_shm_free(ctx, arg);
> > >> @@ -775,7 +776,7 @@ static void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > >>
> > >> switch (OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_GET_RPC_FUNC(param->a0)) {
> > >> case OPTEE_SMC_RPC_FUNC_ALLOC:
> > >> - shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(ctx, param->a1);
> > >> + shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_kernel_buf(optee->ctx, param->a1);
> > >> if (!IS_ERR(shm) && !tee_shm_get_pa(shm, 0, &pa)) {
> > >> reg_pair_from_64(¶m->a1, ¶m->a2, pa);
> > >> reg_pair_from_64(¶m->a4, ¶m->a5,
> > >> --
> > >> 2.31.1
> > >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists