| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMkAt6pnk8apG4VAdM3NRUokBH32pZx-VOrnhzq+7qJu+ubJ3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:00:41 -0700
From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
To: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] KVM: SVM: Pin SEV pages in MMU during sev_launch_update_data()
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:08 PM Nikunj A. Dadhania <nikunj@....com> wrote:
>
> On 1/20/2022 9:47 PM, Peter Gonda wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:07 AM Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> >>
> >> Pin the memory for the data being passed to launch_update_data()
> >> because it gets encrypted before the guest is first run and must
> >> not be moved which would corrupt it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> >> [ * Changed hva_to_gva() to take an extra argument and return gpa_t.
> >> * Updated sev_pin_memory_in_mmu() error handling.
> >> * As pinning/unpining pages is handled within MMU, removed
> >> {get,put}_user(). ]
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> >> index 14aeccfc500b..1ae714e83a3c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >> #include <asm/trapnr.h>
> >> #include <asm/fpu/xcr.h>
> >>
> >> +#include "mmu.h"
> >> #include "x86.h"
> >> #include "svm.h"
> >> #include "svm_ops.h"
> >> @@ -490,6 +491,110 @@ static unsigned long get_num_contig_pages(unsigned long idx,
> >> return pages;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#define SEV_PFERR_RO (PFERR_USER_MASK)
> >> +#define SEV_PFERR_RW (PFERR_WRITE_MASK | PFERR_USER_MASK)
> >> +
> >> +static struct kvm_memory_slot *hva_to_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> >> + unsigned long hva)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
> >> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> >> + int bkt;
> >> +
> >> + kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, bkt, slots) {
> >> + if (hva >= memslot->userspace_addr &&
> >> + hva < memslot->userspace_addr +
> >> + (memslot->npages << PAGE_SHIFT))
> >> + return memslot;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static gpa_t hva_to_gpa(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva, bool *ro)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> >> + gpa_t gpa_offset;
> >> +
> >> + memslot = hva_to_memslot(kvm, hva);
> >> + if (!memslot)
> >> + return UNMAPPED_GVA;
> >> +
> >> + *ro = !!(memslot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY);
> >> + gpa_offset = hva - memslot->userspace_addr;
> >> + return ((memslot->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + gpa_offset);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static struct page **sev_pin_memory_in_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long addr,
> >> + unsigned long size,
> >> + unsigned long *npages)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
> >> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> >> + struct page **pages;
> >> + unsigned long i;
> >> + u32 error_code;
> >> + kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> >> + int idx, ret = 0;
> >> + gpa_t gpa;
> >> + bool ro;
> >> +
> >> + pages = sev_alloc_pages(sev, addr, size, npages);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(pages))
> >> + return pages;
> >> +
> >> + vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, 0);
> >> + if (mutex_lock_killable(&vcpu->mutex)) {
> >> + kvfree(pages);
> >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + vcpu_load(vcpu);
> >> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> >> +
> >> + kvm_mmu_load(vcpu);
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < *npages; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> >> + if (signal_pending(current)) {
> >> + ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (need_resched())
> >> + cond_resched();
> >> +
> >> + gpa = hva_to_gpa(kvm, addr, &ro);
> >> + if (gpa == UNMAPPED_GVA) {
> >> + ret = -EFAULT;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + error_code = ro ? SEV_PFERR_RO : SEV_PFERR_RW;
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Fault in the page and sev_pin_page() will handle the
> >> + * pinning
> >> + */
> >> + pfn = kvm_mmu_map_tdp_page(vcpu, gpa, error_code, PG_LEVEL_4K);
> >> + if (is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn)) {
> >> + ret = -EFAULT;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + pages[i] = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
> >> + srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> >> + vcpu_put(vcpu);
> >> + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex);
> >> +
> >> + if (!ret)
> >> + return pages;
> >> +
> >> + kvfree(pages);
> >> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int sev_launch_update_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> >> {
> >> unsigned long vaddr, vaddr_end, next_vaddr, npages, pages, size, i;
> >> @@ -510,15 +615,21 @@ static int sev_launch_update_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> >> vaddr_end = vaddr + size;
> >>
> >> /* Lock the user memory. */
> >> - inpages = sev_pin_memory(kvm, vaddr, size, &npages, 1);
> >> + if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
> >> + inpages = sev_pin_memory_in_mmu(kvm, vaddr, size, &npages);
> >
> > IIUC we can only use the sev_pin_memory_in_mmu() when there is an
> > online vCPU because that means the MMU has been setup enough to use?
> > Can we add a variable and a comment to help explain that?
> >
> > bool mmu_usable = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) > 0;
>
> Sure, will add comment and the variable.
>
> >
> >> + else
> >> + inpages = sev_pin_memory(kvm, vaddr, size, &npages, 1);
> >
> > So I am confused about this case. Since svm_register_enc_region() is
> > now a NOOP how can a user ensure that memory remains pinned from
> > sev_launch_update_data() to when the memory would be demand pinned?
> >
> > Before users could svm_register_enc_region() which pins the region,
> > then sev_launch_update_data(), then the VM could run an the data from
> > sev_launch_update_data() would have never moved. I don't think that
> > same guarantee is held here?
>
> Yes, you are right. One way is to error out of this call if MMU is not setup.
> Other one would require us to maintain all list of pinned memory via sev_pin_memory()
> and unpin them in the destroy path.
Got it. So we'll probably still need regions_list to track those
pinned regions and free them on destruction.
Also similar changes are probably needed in sev_receive_update_data()?
>
> >> if (IS_ERR(inpages))
> >> return PTR_ERR(inpages);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Flush (on non-coherent CPUs) before LAUNCH_UPDATE encrypts pages in
> >> * place; the cache may contain the data that was written unencrypted.
> >> + * Flushing is automatically handled if the pages can be pinned in the
> >> + * MMU.
> >> */
> >> - sev_clflush_pages(inpages, npages);
> >> + if (!atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
> >> + sev_clflush_pages(inpages, npages);
> >>
> >> data.reserved = 0;
> >> data.handle = sev->handle;
> >> @@ -553,8 +664,13 @@ static int sev_launch_update_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> >> set_page_dirty_lock(inpages[i]);
> >> mark_page_accessed(inpages[i]);
> >> }
> >> +
> >> /* unlock the user pages */
> >> - sev_unpin_memory(kvm, inpages, npages);
> >> + if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
> >> + kvfree(inpages);
>
> >> + else
> >> + sev_unpin_memory(kvm, inpages, npages);
>
> And not unpin here in this case.
>
> Regards
> Nikunj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists