linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220121130145.1bba70d3@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:01:45 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
        posk@...gle.com, avagin@...gle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
        tdelisle@...terloo.ca, mark.rutland@....com, posk@...k.io
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:55:17 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> Latest version, many changes since last time, still under heavy discussion.
> 
> Seems to work with the test-case I have (below), but that still has a few gaps,
> coverage wise.

Nice work, Peter.

> 
> Still haven't done the SMP wakeup thing, finally get the idea with
> worker-timeouts but haven't yet implemented that.
> 
> Happy hacking..
> 
> ----
>

Should the below be added to samples/ ?

-- Steve
 
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <signal.h>

[..]