linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/31] tty: vt: changing LED_* from enum led

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Jan 2022 08:32:25 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Luiz Sampaio <sampaio.ime@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/31] tty: vt: changing LED_* from enum led_brightness
 to actual value

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:54:27PM -0300, Luiz Sampaio wrote:
> The enum led_brightness, which contains the declaration of LED_OFF,
> LED_ON, LED_HALF and LED_FULL is obsolete, as the led class now supports
> max_brightness.
> ---
>  drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> index be8313cdbac3..33bad1973180 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> @@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ static int kbd_led_trigger_activate(struct led_classdev *cdev)
>  	if (ledstate != -1U)
>  		led_trigger_event(&trigger->trigger,
>  				  ledstate & trigger->mask ?
> -					LED_FULL : LED_OFF);
> +					255 : 0);
>  	tasklet_enable(&keyboard_tasklet);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ static void kbd_propagate_led_state(unsigned int old_state,
>  		if (changed & trigger->mask)
>  			led_trigger_event(&trigger->trigger,
>  					  new_state & trigger->mask ?
> -						LED_FULL : LED_OFF);
> +						255 : 0);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after
  adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of the
  email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot