linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YevLmJd48FPx9XcT@osiris>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jan 2022 10:17:12 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in
 ftrace_init

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:11:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:42:28 +0100
> Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > This really should be addressed before rc1 is out, otherwise s390 is
> > broken if somebody enables ftrace.
> > Where "broken" translates to random crashes as soon as ftrace is
> > enabled, which again is nowadays quite common.
> 
> Instead of reverting, should we just add this patch?

That would work as well.

Tested-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>