linux-kernel - Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mmFn8KUjhcOHhTbWGCktK-HEvAQ+nz8HZhM598XqO2aw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jan 2022 14:16:14 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:41 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> So it is coming -- the question is whether we wait a bit until LLVM 11
> is the minimum supported version (nowadays LLVM 10) or we are willing
> to require LLVM 11.

LLVM 11 is now the minimum with commit df05c0e9496c ("Documentation:
Raise the minimum supported version of LLVM to 11.0.0"), so I will
give this a go.

Cheers,
Miguel