linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: phy: qcom: ipq806x-usb: conver latch function to pool macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ye1BcvaneH0sWeQV@matsya>
Date:   Sun, 23 Jan 2022 17:22:18 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: phy: qcom: ipq806x-usb: conver latch
 function to pool macro

On 17-01-22, 01:26, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> Convert latch function to readl pool macro to tidy things up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ipq806x-usb.c | 17 +++++------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ipq806x-usb.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ipq806x-usb.c
> index 6788e0e8272a..ab2d1431546d 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ipq806x-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ipq806x-usb.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@
>  #define SS_CR_READ_REG				BIT(0)
>  #define SS_CR_WRITE_REG				BIT(0)
>  
> +#define LATCH_SLEEP				40
> +#define LATCH_TIMEOUT				100
> +
>  struct usb_phy {
>  	void __iomem		*base;
>  	struct device		*dev;
> @@ -156,19 +159,9 @@ static inline void usb_phy_write_readback(struct usb_phy *phy_dwc3,
>  
>  static int wait_for_latch(void __iomem *addr)
>  {
> -	u32 retry = 10;
> -
> -	while (true) {
> -		if (!readl(addr))
> -			break;

we break if read returns non zero value...

Do you know what is the value expected?

> -
> -		if (--retry == 0)
> -			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> -
> -		usleep_range(10, 20);
> -	}
> +	u32 val;

Okay this contains garbage..
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, !val, LATCH_SLEEP, LATCH_TIMEOUT);

and we are waiting for it read a garbage value!


-- 
~Vinod