[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ye1eZ5rl2E/jy8Tk@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:55:51 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Hao Lee <haolee.swjtu@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
keescook@...omium.org, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: use kmalloc instead of __get_free_page() to alloc
path buffer
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:08:37AM +0000, Hao Lee wrote:
> It's not a standard approach that use __get_free_page() to alloc path
> buffer directly. We'd better use kmalloc and PATH_MAX.
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1764,25 +1764,26 @@ static const char *proc_pid_get_link(struct dentry *dentry,
>
> static int do_proc_readlink(struct path *path, char __user *buffer, int buflen)
> {
> - char *tmp = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + char *buf = NULL;
I'd rather not rename anything but keep it minimal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists