[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220123164441.4ac98b08@xps13>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:44:41 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: kyungmin.park@...sung.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd: onenand: Check for error irq
Hi Jiasheng,
jiasheng@...as.ac.cn wrote on Wed, 5 Jan 2022 00:26:58 +0800:
> For the possible failure of the platform_get_irq(), the returned irq
> could be error number and will finally cause the failure of the
> request_irq().
> Consider that platform_get_irq() can now in certain cases return
> -EPROBE_DEFER, and the consequences of letting request_irq() effectively
> convert that into -EINVAL, even at probe time rather than later on.
> So it might be better to check just now.
>
> Fixes: 2c22120fbd01 ("MTD: OneNAND: interrupt based wait support")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
Applied to nand/next.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists