| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220123001113.2460140-10-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:11:03 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.16 10/19] net/smc: Resolve the race between SMC-R link access and clear
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit 20c9398d3309d170300d67643b851fd26783af24 ]
We encountered some crashes caused by the race between SMC-R
link access and link clear that triggered by abnormal link
group termination, such as port error.
Here is an example of this kind of crashes:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc]
RIP: 0010:smc_llc_flow_initiate+0x44/0x190 [smc]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __smc_buf_create+0x75a/0x950 [smc]
smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs+0x2a/0xbf [smc]
smc_listen_work+0xf72/0x1230 [smc]
? process_one_work+0x25c/0x600
process_one_work+0x25c/0x600
worker_thread+0x4f/0x3a0
? process_one_work+0x600/0x600
kthread+0x15d/0x1a0
? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
</TASK>
smc_listen_work() __smc_lgr_terminate()
---------------------------------------------------------------
| smc_lgr_free()
| |- smcr_link_clear()
| |- memset(lnk, 0)
smc_listen_rdma_reg() |
|- smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs() |
|- smc_llc_flow_initiate() |
|- access lnk->lgr (panic) |
These crashes are similarly caused by clearing SMC-R link
resources when some functions is still accessing to them.
This patch tries to fix the issue by introducing reference
count of SMC-R links and ensuring that the sensitive resources
of links won't be cleared until reference count reaches zero.
The operation to the SMC-R link reference count can be concluded
as follows:
object [hold or initialized as 1] [put]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
links smcr_link_init() smcr_link_clear()
connections smc_conn_create() smc_conn_free()
Through this way, the clear of SMC-R links is later than the
free of all the smc connections above it, thus avoiding the
unsafe reference to SMC-R links.
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/smc/smc_core.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
net/smc/smc_core.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 84b89d13c3359..f4de45ac88189 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -745,6 +745,8 @@ int smcr_link_init(struct smc_link_group *lgr, struct smc_link *lnk,
}
get_device(&lnk->smcibdev->ibdev->dev);
atomic_inc(&lnk->smcibdev->lnk_cnt);
+ refcount_set(&lnk->refcnt, 1); /* link refcnt is set to 1 */
+ lnk->clearing = 0;
lnk->path_mtu = lnk->smcibdev->pattr[lnk->ibport - 1].active_mtu;
lnk->link_id = smcr_next_link_id(lgr);
lnk->lgr = lgr;
@@ -994,8 +996,12 @@ void smc_switch_link_and_count(struct smc_connection *conn,
struct smc_link *to_lnk)
{
atomic_dec(&conn->lnk->conn_cnt);
+ /* link_hold in smc_conn_create() */
+ smcr_link_put(conn->lnk);
conn->lnk = to_lnk;
atomic_inc(&conn->lnk->conn_cnt);
+ /* link_put in smc_conn_free() */
+ smcr_link_hold(conn->lnk);
}
struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
@@ -1152,6 +1158,8 @@ void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
if (!lgr->conns_num)
smc_lgr_schedule_free_work(lgr);
lgr_put:
+ if (!lgr->is_smcd)
+ smcr_link_put(conn->lnk); /* link_hold in smc_conn_create() */
smc_lgr_put(lgr); /* lgr_hold in smc_conn_create() */
}
@@ -1208,22 +1216,11 @@ static void smcr_rtoken_clear_link(struct smc_link *lnk)
}
}
-/* must be called under lgr->llc_conf_mutex lock */
-void smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk, bool log)
+static void __smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk)
{
struct smc_link_group *lgr = lnk->lgr;
struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev;
- if (!lgr || lnk->state == SMC_LNK_UNUSED)
- return;
- lnk->peer_qpn = 0;
- smc_llc_link_clear(lnk, log);
- smcr_buf_unmap_lgr(lnk);
- smcr_rtoken_clear_link(lnk);
- smc_ib_modify_qp_error(lnk);
- smc_wr_free_link(lnk);
- smc_ib_destroy_queue_pair(lnk);
- smc_ib_dealloc_protection_domain(lnk);
smc_wr_free_link_mem(lnk);
smc_ibdev_cnt_dec(lnk);
put_device(&lnk->smcibdev->ibdev->dev);
@@ -1235,6 +1232,35 @@ void smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk, bool log)
smc_lgr_put(lgr); /* lgr_hold in smcr_link_init() */
}
+/* must be called under lgr->llc_conf_mutex lock */
+void smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk, bool log)
+{
+ if (!lnk->lgr || lnk->clearing ||
+ lnk->state == SMC_LNK_UNUSED)
+ return;
+ lnk->clearing = 1;
+ lnk->peer_qpn = 0;
+ smc_llc_link_clear(lnk, log);
+ smcr_buf_unmap_lgr(lnk);
+ smcr_rtoken_clear_link(lnk);
+ smc_ib_modify_qp_error(lnk);
+ smc_wr_free_link(lnk);
+ smc_ib_destroy_queue_pair(lnk);
+ smc_ib_dealloc_protection_domain(lnk);
+ smcr_link_put(lnk); /* theoretically last link_put */
+}
+
+void smcr_link_hold(struct smc_link *lnk)
+{
+ refcount_inc(&lnk->refcnt);
+}
+
+void smcr_link_put(struct smc_link *lnk)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&lnk->refcnt))
+ __smcr_link_clear(lnk);
+}
+
static void smcr_buf_free(struct smc_link_group *lgr, bool is_rmb,
struct smc_buf_desc *buf_desc)
{
@@ -1872,6 +1898,8 @@ int smc_conn_create(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
goto out;
}
smc_lgr_hold(conn->lgr); /* lgr_put in smc_conn_free() */
+ if (!conn->lgr->is_smcd)
+ smcr_link_hold(conn->lnk); /* link_put in smc_conn_free() */
conn->freed = 0;
conn->local_tx_ctrl.common.type = SMC_CDC_MSG_TYPE;
conn->local_tx_ctrl.len = SMC_WR_TX_SIZE;
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
index 51203b16307be..e73217f52f3dd 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ struct smc_link {
u8 peer_link_uid[SMC_LGR_ID_SIZE]; /* peer uid */
u8 link_idx; /* index in lgr link array */
u8 link_is_asym; /* is link asymmetric? */
+ u8 clearing : 1; /* link is being cleared */
+ refcount_t refcnt; /* link reference count */
struct smc_link_group *lgr; /* parent link group */
struct work_struct link_down_wrk; /* wrk to bring link down */
char ibname[IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX]; /* ib device name */
@@ -504,6 +506,8 @@ void smc_core_exit(void);
int smcr_link_init(struct smc_link_group *lgr, struct smc_link *lnk,
u8 link_idx, struct smc_init_info *ini);
void smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk, bool log);
+void smcr_link_hold(struct smc_link *lnk);
+void smcr_link_put(struct smc_link *lnk);
void smc_switch_link_and_count(struct smc_connection *conn,
struct smc_link *to_lnk);
int smcr_buf_map_lgr(struct smc_link *lnk);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists