linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 004/186] mfd: intel-lpss: Fix too early PM enablement in the ACPI ->probe()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124183937.253355140@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:41:19 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Orlando Chamberlain <redecorating@...tonmail.com>,
        Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 004/186] mfd: intel-lpss: Fix too early PM enablement in the ACPI ->probe()

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

commit c9e143084d1a602f829115612e1ec79df3727c8b upstream.

The runtime PM callback may be called as soon as the runtime PM facility
is enabled and activated. It means that ->suspend() may be called before
we finish probing the device in the ACPI case. Hence, NULL pointer
dereference:

  intel-lpss INT34BA:00: IRQ index 0 not found
  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030
  ...
  Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
  RIP: 0010:intel_lpss_suspend+0xb/0x40 [intel_lpss]

To fix this, first try to register the device and only after that enable
runtime PM facility.

Fixes: 4b45efe85263 ("mfd: Add support for Intel Sunrisepoint LPSS devices")
Reported-by: Orlando Chamberlain <redecorating@...tonmail.com>
Reported-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211101190008.86473-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ static int intel_lpss_acpi_probe(struct
 {
 	struct intel_lpss_platform_info *info;
 	const struct acpi_device_id *id;
+	int ret;
 
 	id = acpi_match_device(intel_lpss_acpi_ids, &pdev->dev);
 	if (!id)
@@ -93,10 +94,14 @@ static int intel_lpss_acpi_probe(struct
 	info->mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	info->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
 
+	ret = intel_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, info);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
 
-	return intel_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, info);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int intel_lpss_acpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)