linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 091/239] Bluetooth: hci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124183946.010461138@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:42:09 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 091/239] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Check for error irq

From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>

[ Upstream commit b38cd3b42fba66cc538edb9cf77e07881f43f8e2 ]

For the possible failure of the platform_get_irq(), the returned irq
could be error number and will finally cause the failure of the
request_irq().
Consider that platform_get_irq() can now in certain cases return
-EPROBE_DEFER, and the consequences of letting request_irq() effectively
convert that into -EINVAL, even at probe time rather than later on.
So it might be better to check just now.

Fixes: 0395ffc1ee05 ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add PM for BCM devices")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
index 3e386f68faa02..1a298f13bcc87 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
@@ -1052,7 +1052,12 @@ static int bcm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
-	dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+
+	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	dev->irq = ret;
 
 	if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev)) {
 		ret = bcm_acpi_probe(dev);
-- 
2.34.1