[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38c1fbc3-d770-48f3-5432-8fa1fde033f5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:17:39 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/cpuid: Exclude unpermitted xfeatures for
vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0
On 24/1/2022 3:06 pm, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2022 1:50 PM
>>
>> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>>
>> A malicious user space can bypass xstate_get_guest_group_perm() in the
>> KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID mechanism and obtain unpermitted xfeatures,
>> since the validity check of xcr0 depends only on guest_supported_xcr0.
>
> Unpermitted xfeatures cannot pass kvm_check_cpuid()...
Indeed, 5ab2f45bba4894a0db4af8567da3efd6228dd010.
This part of logic is pretty fragile and fragmented due to semantic
inconsistencies between supported_xcr0 and guest_supported_xcr0
in other three places:
- __do_cpuid_func
- kvm_mpx_supported
- kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave
Have you identified all their areas of use ?
>
>>
>> Fixes: 445ecdf79be0 ("kvm: x86: Exclude unpermitted xfeatures at
>> KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID")
>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index 3902c28fb6cb..1bd4d560cbdd 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 = 0;
>> else
>> vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 =
>> - (best->eax | ((u64)best->edx << 32)) &
>> supported_xcr0;
>> + (best->eax | ((u64)best->edx << 32)) &
>> + (supported_xcr0 & xstate_get_guest_group_perm());
>>
>> /*
>> * Bits 127:0 of the allowed SECS.ATTRIBUTES (CPUID.0x12.0x1)
>> enumerate
>> --
>> 2.33.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists