linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 090/320] xfrm: state and policy should fail if XFRMA_IF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124183956.800549443@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:41:14 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 090/320] xfrm: state and policy should fail if XFRMA_IF_ID 0

From: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>

[ Upstream commit 68ac0f3810e76a853b5f7b90601a05c3048b8b54 ]

xfrm ineterface does not allow xfrm if_id = 0
fail to create or update xfrm state and policy.

With this commit:
 ip xfrm policy add src 192.0.2.1 dst 192.0.2.2 dir out if_id 0
 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

 ip xfrm state add src 192.0.2.1 dst 192.0.2.2 proto esp spi 1 \
            reqid 1 mode tunnel aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
            0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 96 if_id 0
 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

v1->v2 change:
 - add Fixes: tag

Fixes: 9f8550e4bd9d ("xfrm: fix disable_xfrm sysctl when used on xfrm interfaces")
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index ddcf569d852f7..42ff32700d68b 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -621,8 +621,13 @@ static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_construct(struct net *net,
 
 	xfrm_smark_init(attrs, &x->props.smark);
 
-	if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID])
+	if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]) {
 		x->if_id = nla_get_u32(attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]);
+		if (!x->if_id) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto error;
+		}
+	}
 
 	err = __xfrm_init_state(x, false, attrs[XFRMA_OFFLOAD_DEV]);
 	if (err)
@@ -1328,8 +1333,13 @@ static int xfrm_alloc_userspi(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 	mark = xfrm_mark_get(attrs, &m);
 
-	if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID])
+	if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]) {
 		if_id = nla_get_u32(attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]);
+		if (!if_id) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_noput;
+		}
+	}
 
 	if (p->info.seq) {
 		x = xfrm_find_acq_byseq(net, mark, p->info.seq);
@@ -1631,8 +1641,13 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_construct(struct net *net, struct xfrm_us
 
 	xfrm_mark_get(attrs, &xp->mark);
 
-	if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID])
+	if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]) {
 		xp->if_id = nla_get_u32(attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]);
+		if (!xp->if_id) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto error;
+		}
+	}
 
 	return xp;
  error:
-- 
2.34.1