linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 238/563] ext4: avoid trim error on fs with small groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124184032.672243166@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:40:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 238/563] ext4: avoid trim error on fs with small groups

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

[ Upstream commit 173b6e383d2a204c9921ffc1eca3b87aa2106c33 ]

A user reported FITRIM ioctl failing for him on ext4 on some devices
without apparent reason.  After some debugging we've found out that
these devices (being LVM volumes) report rather large discard
granularity of 42MB and the filesystem had 1k blocksize and thus group
size of 8MB. Because ext4 FITRIM implementation puts discard
granularity into minlen, ext4_trim_fs() declared the trim request as
invalid. However just silently doing nothing seems to be a more
appropriate reaction to such combination of parameters since user did
not specify anything wrong.

CC: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Fixes: 5c2ed62fd447 ("ext4: Adjust minlen with discard_granularity in the FITRIM ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211112152202.26614-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/ext4/ioctl.c   | 2 --
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
index cb54ea6461fd8..413bf3d2f7844 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
@@ -1123,8 +1123,6 @@ resizefs_out:
 		    sizeof(range)))
 			return -EFAULT;
 
-		range.minlen = max((unsigned int)range.minlen,
-				   q->limits.discard_granularity);
 		ret = ext4_trim_fs(sb, &range);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index d7cb7d719ee58..60aef7fdd61d0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -5815,6 +5815,7 @@ out:
  */
 int ext4_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
 {
+	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(sb->s_bdev);
 	struct ext4_group_info *grp;
 	ext4_group_t group, first_group, last_group;
 	ext4_grpblk_t cnt = 0, first_cluster, last_cluster;
@@ -5833,6 +5834,13 @@ int ext4_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
 	    start >= max_blks ||
 	    range->len < sb->s_blocksize)
 		return -EINVAL;
+	/* No point to try to trim less than discard granularity */
+	if (range->minlen < q->limits.discard_granularity) {
+		minlen = EXT4_NUM_B2C(EXT4_SB(sb),
+			q->limits.discard_granularity >> sb->s_blocksize_bits);
+		if (minlen > EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb))
+			goto out;
+	}
 	if (end >= max_blks)
 		end = max_blks - 1;
 	if (end <= first_data_blk)
-- 
2.34.1