linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 0057/1039] iio: adc: ti-adc081c: Partial revert of removal of ACPI IDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124184127.063912952@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:30:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Kunyang Fan <Kunyang_Fan@...on.com.tw>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0057/1039] iio: adc: ti-adc081c: Partial revert of removal of ACPI IDs

From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

commit c9791a94384af07592d29504004d2255dbaf8663 upstream.

Unfortuanately a non standards compliant ACPI ID is known to be
in the wild on some AAEON boards.

Partly revert the removal of these IDs so that ADC081C will again
work + add a comment to that affect for future reference.

Whilst here use generic firmware properties rather than the ACPI
specific handling previously found in this driver.

Reported-by: Kunyang Fan <Kunyang_Fan@...on.com.tw>
Fixes: c458b7ca3fd0 ("iio:adc:ti-adc081c: Drop ACPI ids that seem very unlikely to be official.")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Tested-by: Kunyang Fan <Kunyang_Fan@...on.com.tw> #UP-extremei11
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211205172728.2826512-1-jic23@kernel.org
Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc081c.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc081c.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc081c.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
 
 #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
 #include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
@@ -156,13 +157,16 @@ static int adc081c_probe(struct i2c_clie
 {
 	struct iio_dev *iio;
 	struct adc081c *adc;
-	struct adcxx1c_model *model;
+	const struct adcxx1c_model *model;
 	int err;
 
 	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	model = &adcxx1c_models[id->driver_data];
+	if (dev_fwnode(&client->dev))
+		model = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
+	else
+		model = &adcxx1c_models[id->driver_data];
 
 	iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*adc));
 	if (!iio)
@@ -210,10 +214,17 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id adc081
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, adc081c_id);
 
+static const struct acpi_device_id adc081c_acpi_match[] = {
+	/* Used on some AAEON boards */
+	{ "ADC081C", (kernel_ulong_t)&adcxx1c_models[ADC081C] },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc081c_acpi_match);
+
 static const struct of_device_id adc081c_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "ti,adc081c" },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,adc101c" },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,adc121c" },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,adc081c", .data = &adcxx1c_models[ADC081C] },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,adc101c", .data = &adcxx1c_models[ADC101C] },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,adc121c", .data = &adcxx1c_models[ADC121C] },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adc081c_of_match);
@@ -222,6 +233,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver adc081c_driver
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "adc081c",
 		.of_match_table = adc081c_of_match,
+		.acpi_match_table = adc081c_acpi_match,
 	},
 	.probe = adc081c_probe,
 	.id_table = adc081c_id,