linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 148/563] mwifiex: Fix possible ABBA deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:38:33 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 148/563] mwifiex: Fix possible ABBA deadlock

From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>

[ Upstream commit 1b8bb8919ef81bfc8873d223b9361f1685f2106d ]

Quoting Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>:

  mwifiex_dequeue_tx_packet()
     spin_lock_bh(&priv->wmm.ra_list_spinlock); --> Line 1432 (Lock A)
     mwifiex_send_addba()
       spin_lock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock); --> Line 608 (Lock B)

  mwifiex_process_sta_tx_pause()
     spin_lock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock); --> Line 398 (Lock B)
     mwifiex_update_ralist_tx_pause()
       spin_lock_bh(&priv->wmm.ra_list_spinlock); --> Line 941 (Lock A)

Similar report for mwifiex_process_uap_tx_pause().

While the locking expectations in this driver are a bit unclear, the
Fixed commit only intended to protect the sta_ptr, so we can drop the
lock as soon as we're done with it.

IIUC, this deadlock cannot actually happen, because command event
processing (which calls mwifiex_process_sta_tx_pause()) is
sequentialized with TX packet processing (e.g.,
mwifiex_dequeue_tx_packet()) via the main loop (mwifiex_main_process()).
But it's good not to leave this potential issue lurking.

Fixes: f0f7c2275fb9 ("mwifiex: minor cleanups w/ sta_list_spinlock in cfg80211.c")
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/0e495b14-efbb-e0da-37bd-af6bd677ee2c@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YaV0pllJ5p/EuUat@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
index bc79ca4cb803c..753458628f86a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
@@ -364,10 +364,12 @@ static void mwifiex_process_uap_tx_pause(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
 		sta_ptr = mwifiex_get_sta_entry(priv, tp->peermac);
 		if (sta_ptr && sta_ptr->tx_pause != tp->tx_pause) {
 			sta_ptr->tx_pause = tp->tx_pause;
+			spin_unlock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock);
 			mwifiex_update_ralist_tx_pause(priv, tp->peermac,
 						       tp->tx_pause);
+		} else {
+			spin_unlock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock);
 		}
-		spin_unlock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -399,11 +401,13 @@ static void mwifiex_process_sta_tx_pause(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
 			sta_ptr = mwifiex_get_sta_entry(priv, tp->peermac);
 			if (sta_ptr && sta_ptr->tx_pause != tp->tx_pause) {
 				sta_ptr->tx_pause = tp->tx_pause;
+				spin_unlock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock);
 				mwifiex_update_ralist_tx_pause(priv,
 							       tp->peermac,
 							       tp->tx_pause);
+			} else {
+				spin_unlock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock);
 			}
-			spin_unlock_bh(&priv->sta_list_spinlock);
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.34.1