[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276BE30652988271878E78C8C5E9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:58:18 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 7/7] iommu: Add iommu_domain::domain_ops
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:11 PM
> +/**
> + * struct domain_ops - per-domain ops
> + * @attach_dev: attach an iommu domain to a device
> + * @detach_dev: detach an iommu domain from a device
What is the criteria about whether an op should be iommu_ops or domain_ops
when it requires both domain and device pointers like above two (and future
PASID-based attach)?
Other examples include:
@apply_resv_region
@is_attach_deferred
Thanks
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists