[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220124184127.559922995@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:31:00 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0071/1039] io_uring: fix no lock protection for ctx->cq_extra
From: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>
commit e302f1046f4c209291b07ff7bc4d15ca26891f16 upstream.
ctx->cq_extra should be protected by completion lock so that the
req_need_defer() does the right check.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125092103.224502-2-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -6544,12 +6544,15 @@ static __cold void io_drain_req(struct i
u32 seq = io_get_sequence(req);
/* Still need defer if there is pending req in defer list. */
+ spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (!req_need_defer(req, seq) && list_empty_careful(&ctx->defer_list)) {
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
queue:
ctx->drain_active = false;
io_req_task_queue(req);
return;
}
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
if (ret) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists