linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 0079/1039] shmem: fix a race between shmem_unused_huge_shrink and shmem_evict

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124184127.824709501@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:31:08 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0079/1039] shmem: fix a race between shmem_unused_huge_shrink and shmem_evict_inode

From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>

commit 62c9827cbb996c2c04f615ecd783ce28bcea894b upstream.

Fix a data race in commit 779750d20b93 ("shmem: split huge pages beyond
i_size under memory pressure").

Here are call traces causing race:

   Call Trace 1:
     shmem_unused_huge_shrink+0x3ae/0x410
     ? __list_lru_walk_one.isra.5+0x33/0x160
     super_cache_scan+0x17c/0x190
     shrink_slab.part.55+0x1ef/0x3f0
     shrink_node+0x10e/0x330
     kswapd+0x380/0x740
     kthread+0xfc/0x130
     ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x170/0x170
     ? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
     ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

   Call Trace 2:
     shmem_evict_inode+0xd8/0x190
     evict+0xbe/0x1c0
     do_unlinkat+0x137/0x330
     do_syscall_64+0x76/0x120
     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2

A simple explanation:

Image there are 3 items in the local list (@list).  In the first
traversal, A is not deleted from @list.

  1)    A->B->C
        ^
        |
        pos (leave)

In the second traversal, B is deleted from @list.  Concurrently, A is
deleted from @list through shmem_evict_inode() since last reference
counter of inode is dropped by other thread.  Then the @list is corrupted.

  2)    A->B->C
        ^  ^
        |  |
     evict pos (drop)

We should make sure the inode is either on the global list or deleted from
any local list before iput().

Fixed by moving inodes back to global list before we put them.

[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: coding style fixes]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211125064502.99983-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com
Fixes: 779750d20b93 ("shmem: split huge pages beyond i_size under memory pressure")
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 mm/shmem.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ static unsigned long shmem_unused_huge_s
 	struct shmem_inode_info *info;
 	struct page *page;
 	unsigned long batch = sc ? sc->nr_to_scan : 128;
-	int removed = 0, split = 0;
+	int split = 0;
 
 	if (list_empty(&sbinfo->shrinklist))
 		return SHRINK_STOP;
@@ -569,7 +569,6 @@ static unsigned long shmem_unused_huge_s
 		/* inode is about to be evicted */
 		if (!inode) {
 			list_del_init(&info->shrinklist);
-			removed++;
 			goto next;
 		}
 
@@ -577,12 +576,12 @@ static unsigned long shmem_unused_huge_s
 		if (round_up(inode->i_size, PAGE_SIZE) ==
 				round_up(inode->i_size, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)) {
 			list_move(&info->shrinklist, &to_remove);
-			removed++;
 			goto next;
 		}
 
 		list_move(&info->shrinklist, &list);
 next:
+		sbinfo->shrinklist_len--;
 		if (!--batch)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -602,7 +601,7 @@ next:
 		inode = &info->vfs_inode;
 
 		if (nr_to_split && split >= nr_to_split)
-			goto leave;
+			goto move_back;
 
 		page = find_get_page(inode->i_mapping,
 				(inode->i_size & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -616,38 +615,44 @@ next:
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * Leave the inode on the list if we failed to lock
-		 * the page at this time.
+		 * Move the inode on the list back to shrinklist if we failed
+		 * to lock the page at this time.
 		 *
 		 * Waiting for the lock may lead to deadlock in the
 		 * reclaim path.
 		 */
 		if (!trylock_page(page)) {
 			put_page(page);
-			goto leave;
+			goto move_back;
 		}
 
 		ret = split_huge_page(page);
 		unlock_page(page);
 		put_page(page);
 
-		/* If split failed leave the inode on the list */
+		/* If split failed move the inode on the list back to shrinklist */
 		if (ret)
-			goto leave;
+			goto move_back;
 
 		split++;
 drop:
 		list_del_init(&info->shrinklist);
-		removed++;
-leave:
+		goto put;
+move_back:
+		/*
+		 * Make sure the inode is either on the global list or deleted
+		 * from any local list before iput() since it could be deleted
+		 * in another thread once we put the inode (then the local list
+		 * is corrupted).
+		 */
+		spin_lock(&sbinfo->shrinklist_lock);
+		list_move(&info->shrinklist, &sbinfo->shrinklist);
+		sbinfo->shrinklist_len++;
+		spin_unlock(&sbinfo->shrinklist_lock);
+put:
 		iput(inode);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&sbinfo->shrinklist_lock);
-	list_splice_tail(&list, &sbinfo->shrinklist);
-	sbinfo->shrinklist_len -= removed;
-	spin_unlock(&sbinfo->shrinklist_lock);
-
 	return split;
 }