lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM9PR08MB60200FA42FAB6DB843718F0A975E9@AM9PR08MB6020.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:37:43 +0000
From:   Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>
To:     James Clark <James.Clark@....com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        "leo.yan@...aro.com" <leo.yan@...aro.com>,
        Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] perf/core: Wake up parent event if inherited
 event has no ring buffer

Hi everyone,

I've tried running a benchmark with and without this patch applied, with the following options:
 perf record -e arm_spe_0/event_filter=0,jitter=0,ts_enable=1,pa_enable=0,min_latency=0/ ...
repeating it 60 times with and without the patch.

Without the patch, the output perf.data sizes were: 1.0G 1.0G 1.0G 1.0G 1.0G 1.0G 1.0G 1.0G 47M 48M 48M 48M 48M 48M 48M 48M 48M 48M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 49M 60M 60M 60M 60M 61M 61M 61M 61M 61M 61M 61M 62M 62M 62M 62M 62M 62M 62M 62M 62M 63M 63M 63M 65M 990M i.e. 47MB to 1.0GB

With the patch, the output sizes were: 1.4G 1.4G 1.4G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G 1.5G i.e. 1.4GB to 1.5GB.

Tested-by: Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ