lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:49:39 +0100 From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> To: Roger Lu <roger.lu@...iatek.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> Cc: Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>, HenryC Chen <HenryC.Chen@...iatek.com>, Xiaoqing Liu <Xiaoqing.Liu@...iatek.com>, Charles Yang <Charles.Yang@...iatek.com>, Angus Lin <Angus.Lin@...iatek.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 7/8] arm64: dts: mt8192: add svs device information Il 24/01/22 11:48, Roger Lu ha scritto: > Hi AngeloGioacchino, > > On Fri, 2022-01-07 at 15:33 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 07/01/22 10:51, Roger Lu ha scritto: >>> Add compitable/reg/irq/clock/efuse/reset setting in svs node. >> >> Typo: compitable => compatible >> .. also, you're not only adding the svs node, but also efuse: please add that >> information in the commit description. >> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roger Lu <roger.lu@...iatek.com> >> >> This patch seems to not apply on top of the current linux-next, can you please >> rebase it? That would resolve issues with this series and would be picked >> sooner. >> >> Apart from that... > > Sorry to make you confuse. After having discussion internally, we'll submit > another complete mt8192.dtsi patch including this svs node. Therefore, I'll drop > this path from svs patchset in order not to make the reviewer confuse. Thanks > for the comments a lot. > Yes that decision looks good to me, as this allows different maintainers to apply patches on a per-subsystem basis. Thanks! Regards, Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists