[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNNc6F7tRVn=UqLaW0WAgTr67XFm=CUu5X2D0Xbt3nKXwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:21:15 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: "liupeng (DM)" <liupeng256@...wei.com>
Cc: glider@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, corbet@....net,
sumit.semwal@...aro.org, christian.koenig@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] kfence: Make test case compatible with run time
set sample interval
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 13:19, liupeng (DM) <liupeng256@...wei.com> wrote:
[...]
> When KFENCE pool size can be adjusted by boot parameters(assumption),
> automatically test and train KFENCE may be useful. So far, exporting
> kfence.sample_interval is not necessary.
I'm not opposed to the patch (I've also run into this issue, but not
too frequently) - feel free to just send it with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists