[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220124171759.GD966497@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:17:59 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] iommu: Add iommu_domain::domain_ops
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:58:18AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:11 PM
> > +/**
> > + * struct domain_ops - per-domain ops
> > + * @attach_dev: attach an iommu domain to a device
> > + * @detach_dev: detach an iommu domain from a device
>
> What is the criteria about whether an op should be iommu_ops or domain_ops
> when it requires both domain and device pointers like above two (and future
> PASID-based attach)?
>
> Other examples include:
> @apply_resv_region
For apply_resv_region the 'dev' argument is really selecting a device
that is already attached to the domain, so it should be in the domain
ops.
> @is_attach_deferred
Only two drivers implement this and neither use the domain
argument. Remove the domain argument and keep it in the iommu_ops
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists