lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:33:06 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add lpasscore & lpassaudio
 clock controllers

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Add the low pass audio clock controller device nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> Dependent onLPASS clock controller change: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/1/24/772
>
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 937c2e0e93eb..0aa834ce6b61 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7280.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc-sc7280.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,lpassaudiocc-sc7280.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,lpasscorecc-sc7280.h>

Presumably using these two include files means a dependency on things
landing in the clk tree [1]. Unless Stephen and Bjorn want to work
something out, I'd guess you'll need to re-post with just hardcoded
numbers for now?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124162442.29497-2-tdas@codeaurora.org/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists