linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/563] 5.10.94-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <67b47645-016c-2d23-4710-b3743b073766@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:54:58 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/563] 5.10.94-rc1 review



On 1/24/2022 3:00 PM, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 1/24/22 12:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.94 release.
>> There are 563 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:39:11 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.94-rc1.gz 
>>
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
>> linux-5.10.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> Regressions detected on arm, arm64, i386, x86.
> 
> This is from arm64:
>    /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c: In function 'fixup_exception':
>    /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c:17:13: error: implicit 
> declaration of function 'in_bpf_jit' 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       17 |         if (in_bpf_jit(regs))
>          |             ^~~~~~~~~~
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>    make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:280: 
> arch/arm64/mm/extable.o] Error 1
> 
> And from Perf on arm, arm64, i386, x86:
>    libbpf.c: In function 'bpf_object__elf_collect':
>    libbpf.c:2873:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 
> 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
>     2873 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
>          |                               ^~
>    libbpf.c:2877:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 
> 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
>     2877 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
>          |                               ^~
>    make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: 
> /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/staticobjs/libbpf.o] Error 1
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Same here.
-- 
Florian