[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2b71789-5072-9b40-1839-a662d9f64064@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:14:09 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm, hwpoison: remove obsolete comment
On 1/25/22 8:26 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
>
> With the introduction of mf_mutex, most of memory error handling
> process is mutually exclusive, so the in-line comment about
> subtlety about double-checking PageHWPoison is no more correct.
> So remove it.
>
> Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 4c9bd1d37301..a6a1e02759e7 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2146,12 +2146,6 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
> .gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
> };
>
> - /*
> - * Check PageHWPoison again inside page lock because PageHWPoison
> - * is set by memory_failure() outside page lock. Note that
> - * memory_failure() also double-checks PageHWPoison inside page lock,
> - * so there's no race between soft_offline_page() and memory_failure().
> - */
> lock_page(page);
> if (!PageHuge(page))
> wait_on_page_writeback(page);
>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists