linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.16 0728/1039] scripts: sphinx-pre-install: Fix ctex support on Debian

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ye+61LN8AYJ43tIG@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:54:44 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 0728/1039] scripts: sphinx-pre-install: Fix ctex
 support on Debian

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:15:51AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:48:39 +0900
> Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com> escreveu:
> 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:41:57 +0100,
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > [ Upstream commit 87d6576ddf8ac25f36597bc93ca17f6628289c16 ]
> > > 
> > > The name of the package with ctexhook.sty is different on
> > > Debian/Ubuntu.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> > > Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/63882425609a2820fac78f5e94620abeb7ed5f6f.1641429634.git.mchehab@kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>  
> > 
> > This "Fix" is against upstream commit 7baab965896e ("scripts:
> > sphinx-pre-install: add required ctex dependency") which is
> > also new to v5.17-rc1.
> > 
> > So I don't think this is worth backporting to stable branches.
> 
> Well, either both patches should be backported or none, IMHO.
> I guess I would just backport also commit 7baab965896e.

Ok, in looking at that report, it makes sense, I'll add both of these
now.

thanks,

greg k-h