[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f451e67d-adb9-01e8-bd11-bf7804863b4b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:08:36 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, wander@...hat.com
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: Use fifo in 8250 console driver
On 25. 01. 22, 9:39, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2021 21:14, wander@...hat.com wrote:
>> From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
>>
>> Note: I am using a small test app + driver located at [0] for the
>> problem description. serco is a driver whose write function dispatches
>> to the serial controller. sertest is a user-mode app that writes n bytes
>> to the serial console using the serco driver.
>>
>> While investigating a bug in the RHEL kernel, I noticed that the serial
>> console throughput is way below the configured speed of 115200 bps in
>> a HP Proliant DL380 Gen9. I was expecting something above 10KB/s, but
>> I got 2.5KB/s.
>>
>> $ time ./sertest -n 2500 /tmp/serco
>>
>> real 0m0.997s
>> user 0m0.000s
>> sys 0m0.997s
>>
>> With the help of the function tracer, I then noticed the serial
>> controller was taking around 410us seconds to dispatch one single byte:
>>
>> $ trace-cmd record -p function_graph -g serial8250_console_write \
>> ./sertest -n 1 /tmp/serco
>>
>> $ trace-cmd report
>>
>> | serial8250_console_write() {
>> 0.384 us | _raw_spin_lock_irqsave();
>> 1.836 us | io_serial_in();
>> 1.667 us | io_serial_out();
>> | uart_console_write() {
>> | serial8250_console_putchar() {
>> | wait_for_xmitr() {
>> 1.870 us | io_serial_in();
>> 2.238 us | }
>> 1.737 us | io_serial_out();
>> 4.318 us | }
>> 4.675 us | }
>> | wait_for_xmitr() {
>> 1.635 us | io_serial_in();
>> | __const_udelay() {
>> 1.125 us | delay_tsc();
>> 1.429 us | }
>> ...
>> ...
>> ...
>> 1.683 us | io_serial_in();
>> | __const_udelay() {
>> 1.248 us | delay_tsc();
>> 1.486 us | }
>> 1.671 us | io_serial_in();
>> 411.342 us | }
>>
>> In another machine, I measured a throughput of 11.5KB/s, with the serial
>> controller taking between 80-90us to send each byte. That matches the
>> expected throughput for a configuration of 115200 bps.
>>
>> This patch changes the serial8250_console_write to use the 16550 fifo
>> if available. In my benchmarks I got around 25% improvement in the slow
>> machine, and no performance penalty in the fast machine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
>
>
> On the current mainline and -next branches, I have noticed that the
> serial output on many of our Tegra boards is corrupted and so
> parsing the serial output is failing.
>
> Before this change the serial console would appear as follows ...
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x411fd071]
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.16.0-rc6-00091-gadbfddc757ae
> (jonathanh@...athanh-vm-01) (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC
> 6.4-2017.08) 6.4.1 20170707, GNU ld (Linaro_Binutils-2017.08)
> 2.27.0.20161019) #15 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jan 25 00:15:25 PST 2022
> [ 0.000000] Machine model: NVIDIA Jetson TX1 Developer Kit
>
> And now I see ...
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physicalfd071]
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.16.0-rc6-athanh@...inux-g017.08)
> Linaro_B20161019n 25 00:[ 0.000000] Machine model: NVIDIA Jet[
> 0.000000] efi: UEFI not found.
> [ 0.000000] NUMA: No NUMA configurati[ 0.000000] NUMA: Faking a
> node at [m00000001[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17[ 0.000000]
> Zone ranges:
>
> Bisecting is pointing to this commit. Let me know if there are any
> tests I can run. Otherwise we may need to disable this at least
> for Tegra.
The test is bogus:
use_fifo = (up->capabilities & UART_CAP_FIFO) &&
port->fifosize > 1 &&
(serial_port_in(port, UART_FCR) & UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO)
FCR is write only. Reading it, one gets IIR contents.
regards,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists