linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom_smd: fix for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164310605364.75017.9038445361122316011.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:20:53 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom_smd: fix for_each_child.cocci warnings

On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 12:11:38 +0100 (CET), Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c:1318:1-33: WARNING: Function "for_each_available_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before return around line 1321.
> 
> 
> Semantic patch information:
>  False positives can be due to function calls within the for_each
>  loop that may encapsulate an of_node_put.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: qcom_smd: fix for_each_child.cocci warnings
      commit: 6390d42c21efff0b4c10956a38e341f4e84ecd3d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark