linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/563] 5.10.94-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:04:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/563] 5.10.94-rc1 review

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 07:54:58PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/24/2022 3:00 PM, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > On 1/24/22 12:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.94 release.
> > > There are 563 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:39:11 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.94-rc1.gz
> > > 
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > > linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > Regressions detected on arm, arm64, i386, x86.
> > 
> > This is from arm64:
> >    /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c: In function 'fixup_exception':
> >    /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c:17:13: error: implicit
> > declaration of function 'in_bpf_jit'
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >       17 |         if (in_bpf_jit(regs))
> >          |             ^~~~~~~~~~
> >    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >    make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:280:
> > arch/arm64/mm/extable.o] Error 1
> > 
> > And from Perf on arm, arm64, i386, x86:
> >    libbpf.c: In function 'bpf_object__elf_collect':
> >    libbpf.c:2873:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have
> > 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
> >     2873 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
> >          |                               ^~
> >    libbpf.c:2877:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have
> > 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
> >     2877 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
> >          |                               ^~
> >    make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:97:
> > /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/staticobjs/libbpf.o] Error
> > 1
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> Same here.

Thanks, I'll go drop this from all 3 trees now.

greg k-h