linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/846] 5.15.17-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ye/Z0Z376A6BHKhC@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:06:57 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/846] 5.15.17-rc1 review

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:50:45PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 1/24/22 12:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.17 release.
> > There are 846 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:39:11 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.17-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Regressions detected on arm, arm64, i386, x86.
> 
> This is one from arm64:
>   /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c: In function 'fixup_exception':
>   /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c:17:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_bpf_jit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      17 |         if (in_bpf_jit(regs))
>         |             ^~~~~~~~~~
>   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>   make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:277: arch/arm64/mm/extable.o] Error 1
> 
> This is another one, in Perf (arm, arm64, i386, x86):
>   libbpf.c: In function 'bpf_object__elf_collect':
>   libbpf.c:3038:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
>    3038 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
>         |                               ^~
>   libbpf.c:3042:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
>    3042 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
>         |                               ^~
>   make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/staticobjs/libbpf.o] Error 1
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 

Thanks, should be fixed in -rc2.

greg k-h