linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/320] 5.4.174-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ye/a7UZCEzBWXe66@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:11:41 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/320] 5.4.174-rc1 review

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:39:58PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 1/24/22 12:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.174 release.
> > There are 320 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:39:11 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.174-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Regressions detected on arm, arm64, i386, x86, parisc.
> 
> This is on Perf on arm, arm64, i386, x86:
> 
>   libbpf.c: In function 'bpf_object__elf_collect':
>   libbpf.c:1581:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
>    1581 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
>         |                               ^~
>   libbpf.c:1585:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
>    1585 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
>         |                               ^~
>   make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/staticobjs/libbpf.o] Error 1

libbpf is not perf :)

Anyway, I'll go drop the offending libbpf patch, thanks.

> This is from PA-RISC with gcc-8, gcc-9, gcc-10, gcc-11:
> 
>   /builds/linux/drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c: In function 'sba_io_pdir_entry':
>   /builds/linux/arch/parisc/include/asm/special_insns.h:11:3: error: expected ':' or ')' before 'ASM_EXCEPTIONTABLE_ENTRY'
>      ASM_EXCEPTIONTABLE_ENTRY(8b, 9b) \
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> Bisection of the latter points to "parisc: Fix lpa and lpa_user defines".

thanks, will go drop this one from 5.4.

greg k-h