linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 001/563] KVM: VMX: switch blocked_vcpu_on_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220124184024.464020334@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:36:06 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 001/563] KVM: VMX: switch blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock to raw spinlock

From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>

commit 5f02ef741a785678930f3ff0a8b6b2b0ef1bb402 upstream.

blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock is taken from hard interrupt context
(pi_wakeup_handler), therefore it cannot sleep.

Switch it to a raw spinlock.

Fixes:

[41297.066254] BUG: scheduling while atomic: CPU 0/KVM/635218/0x00010001
[41297.066323] Preemption disabled at:
[41297.066324] [<ffffffff902ee47f>] irq_enter_rcu+0xf/0x60
[41297.066339] Call Trace:
[41297.066342]  <IRQ>
[41297.066346]  dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
[41297.066353]  ? irq_enter_rcu+0xf/0x60
[41297.066356]  __schedule_bug.cold+0x7d/0x8b
[41297.066361]  __schedule+0x439/0x5b0
[41297.066365]  ? task_blocks_on_rt_mutex.constprop.0.isra.0+0x1b0/0x440
[41297.066369]  schedule_rtlock+0x1e/0x40
[41297.066371]  rtlock_slowlock_locked+0xf1/0x260
[41297.066374]  rt_spin_lock+0x3b/0x60
[41297.066378]  pi_wakeup_handler+0x31/0x90 [kvm_intel]
[41297.066388]  sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi+0x9d/0xd0
[41297.066392]  </IRQ>
[41297.066392]  asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi+0x12/0x20
...

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
  * can find which vCPU should be waken up.
  */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, blocked_vcpu_on_cpu);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(raw_spinlock_t, blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock);
 
 static inline struct pi_desc *vcpu_to_pi_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ static void __pi_post_block(struct kvm_v
 			   new.control) != old.control);
 
 	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->pre_pcpu == -1)) {
-		spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
+		raw_spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
 		list_del(&vcpu->blocked_vcpu_list);
-		spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
+		raw_spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
 		vcpu->pre_pcpu = -1;
 	}
 }
@@ -154,11 +154,11 @@ int pi_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	local_irq_disable();
 	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->pre_pcpu != -1)) {
 		vcpu->pre_pcpu = vcpu->cpu;
-		spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
+		raw_spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
 		list_add_tail(&vcpu->blocked_vcpu_list,
 			      &per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu,
 				       vcpu->pre_pcpu));
-		spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
+		raw_spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
 	}
 
 	do {
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void pi_wakeup_handler(void)
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
-	spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
+	raw_spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
 	list_for_each_entry(vcpu, &per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu, cpu),
 			blocked_vcpu_list) {
 		struct pi_desc *pi_desc = vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu);
@@ -223,13 +223,13 @@ void pi_wakeup_handler(void)
 		if (pi_test_on(pi_desc) == 1)
 			kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
+	raw_spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
 }
 
 void __init pi_init_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu, cpu));
-	spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
 }
 
 bool pi_has_pending_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)