lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:49:14 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kisskb: FAILED linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8 Tue Jan 25, 18:24

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 9:47 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 8:31 AM <noreply@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> > FAILED linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8 Tue Jan 25, 18:24
> >
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14688953/
> >
> > Commit:   Add linux-next specific files for 20220125
> >           d25ee88530253138d0b20d43511ca5acbda4e9f7
> > Compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0 / GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.30
> >
> > Possible errors
> > ---------------
> >
> > arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:329:20: error: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of 'long unsigned int[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.o] Error 1
> > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:572: drivers/net/ipa] Error 2
> > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:572: drivers/net] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [Makefile:1965: drivers] Error 2
> > make: *** [Makefile:226: __sub-make] Error 2
> >
> > No warnings found in log.
>
> The code that causes this is drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c:ipa_mem_valid():
>
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(regions, IPA_MEM_COUNT) = { };
>         ...
>         for_each_clear_bit(mem_id, regions, IPA_MEM_COUNT) {
>                 if (ipa_mem_id_required(ipa, mem_id))
>                         dev_err(dev, "required memory region %u missing\n",
>                                 mem_id);
>         }
>
> This only happens with gcc-8, not with gcc-9, so it might be a
> compiler bug. I don't see anything wrong with c:ipa_mem_valid()
> nor with m68k's find_first_zero_bit().

I've seen problems with warnings like this when gcc only partially
inlines one of the functions. Does it go away if you mark find_next_bit()
and find_first_bit() as __always_inline?

       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ