linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] perf tools: Add support for user defined metric

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c806fa8-d248-940c-d7f7-51a636e988e1@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:51:37 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@...wei.com>,
        Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        "irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] perf tools: Add support for user defined metric

On 25/01/2022 12:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> On 11/05/2020 21:53, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> +
>>
>> Hi jirka,
>>
>> Did you a plan to continue to work? I don't think that this support was
>> ever merged.
>>
>> We have a requirement to be able to tune parameters of metrics, and
>> support here seems suitable.
> John,
> 
> 

Hi Arnaldo,

> Have you tried to apply that series to see if it still applies?

It doesn't apply on v5.17-rc1 (which is same as you acme perf/core branch).

Anyway, from checking this old thread, it seems that further changes 
were going to be added.

Thanks,
John