[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220124184143.658837249@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:38:56 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0547/1039] libbpf: Improve sanity checking during BTF fix up
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit 88918dc12dc357a06d8d722a684617b1c87a4654 ]
If BTF is corrupted DATASEC's variable type ID might be incorrect.
Prevent this easy to detect situation with extra NULL check.
Reported by oss-fuzz project.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103173213.1376990-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 1cc0383471f01..c7ba5e6ed9cfe 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -2753,13 +2753,12 @@ static int btf_fixup_datasec(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf,
for (i = 0, vsi = btf_var_secinfos(t); i < vars; i++, vsi++) {
t_var = btf__type_by_id(btf, vsi->type);
- var = btf_var(t_var);
-
- if (!btf_is_var(t_var)) {
+ if (!t_var || !btf_is_var(t_var)) {
pr_debug("Non-VAR type seen in section %s\n", name);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ var = btf_var(t_var);
if (var->linkage == BTF_VAR_STATIC)
continue;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists