linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Cleanup and removal of DBG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfAYOVY7jFDubwc5@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:33:13 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Cc:     dan.carpenter@...cle.com, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
        straube.linux@...il.com, martin@...ser.cx,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        paskripkin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Cleanup and removal of DBG_88E macro

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:44:05PM +0000, Phillip Potter wrote:
> This series does a few things in order to effect the removal of the
> DBG_88E macro:
> 
> (1) It removes previously converted calls for consistency.
> (2) It removes all current DBG_88E calls.
> (3) It removes all aliased DBG_88E calls.
> (4) It removes the GlobalDebugLevel flag and the file that defines it.
> 
> By its very nature, it is a large patchset, so I've tried to group as
> appropriate. I went by file as I did the work, which led to over 40
> patches originally, so I've listed the largest C files as their own
> patches and then grouped everything else by subdir which gives closer
> sizes for the other patches.

Can you rebase this on my staging-testing branch?  It no longer applies
:(

thanks,

greg k-h